Add to that whatever backup solution you like to employ and you are good to go. The best configuration I can see for this is a fast NVMe based SSD for your OS and then a 256GB cache drive plus a large mechanical hard drive. I can't use it in my system either, but that hardly makes it a marketing gimmick. How on Earth is performance not usable? It's a solution that works fine in certain situations. This technology makes that impossible.Īll in all, it looks more like a toy for use in marketing (like the junky little prize in a box of Cracker Jacks) or for cheesing benchmarks than a usable tool. If it isn't, then it's a non-starter for serious work.įurthermore, I want to be able to pull out a drive with full knowledge of what information I'm removing from the system. Furthermore, the review and slides don't address whether this technology is compatible with backup and disk-imaging utilities. Not being able to handle drive failure, leading to potential loss of important data or an unbootable system, is unacceptable, especially when HDDs are involved, but the article says this technology can't handle it. Speed isn't the only criteria I use in deciding where data should go: reliability and configuration change capability are as well. "AMD StoreMI is not a caching solution it utilizes advanced machine intelligence, virtualization and automated tiering to analyze the data blocks that are most often accessed, and actually moves those blocks to the fastest storage tier."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |